Home  /  Recent Bills  /  A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".
SENATE · SJRES 3 119 CONGRESS

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

INTRODUCED
January 21, 2025
POLICY AREA
STATUS
Message received in Senate: Returned to the Senate pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 212.
SOURCE
Congress.gov ↗
This is a joint resolution, not an ordinary bill

A joint resolution goes through the same process as a bill and carries the same legal force once signed. One exception: a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment is not presented to the President — it needs a two-thirds vote in both chambers and then ratification by three-quarters of the states. Bill vs. resolution, explained →

Summary

This joint resolution, S.J. Res. 3, invokes the Congressional Review Act (CRA) of 1996 to nullify an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rule requiring certain brokers and digital asset platforms to report information about customers' cryptocurrency transactions. Specifically, it targets the IRS rule titled 'Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales,' published in the Federal Register on December 30, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 106928). The rule would mandate that brokers who regularly facilitate digital asset sales—such as cryptocurrency exchanges, certain wallet providers, and other entities acting as intermediaries in crypto transactions—report gross proceeds and customer information to the IRS using a new Form 1099-DA, similar to how traditional brokers report stock sales on Form 1099-B. If enacted via presidential signature or congressional override of a veto, this joint resolution would legally invalidate the IRS rule, meaning it would have 'no force or effect.' The measure passed the Senate on March 4, 2025, and awaits consideration in the House of Representatives. Proponents argue the rule overreaches by attempting to apply traditional securities reporting frameworks to decentralized and innovative digital assets, imposing burdensome compliance costs on businesses and compromising user privacy. Critics contend that eliminating the rule would create a significant tax loophole, enabling widespread tax evasion in the rapidly growing cryptocurrency market and undermining efforts to ensure that digital asset transactions are subject to the same tax obligations as other financial instruments. The resolution highlights the ongoing tension between fostering innovation in financial technology and ensuring adequate tax compliance and consumer protection in emerging markets.

Ask This Bill

Ask a specific question about this bill’s actual text — answers cite the section they come from.

Read the full analysis on Congress.gov →

Where Each Party Stands

Democrats

MIGHT SUPPORT
+Protects user privacy by preventing the IRS from collecting detailed transaction data on cryptocurrency users.
+Reduces regulatory burden on emerging fintech companies and cryptocurrency businesses, fostering innovation.
+Prevents potential overreach by federal agencies in applying outdated financial regulations to new technologies.
+Addresses concerns that the rule could inadvertently capture non-broker entities like software developers or miners in its reporting requirements.
+Aligns with Republican principles of limited government intervention in private financial transactions.
MIGHT OPPOSE
−Would create a significant tax loophole, allowing cryptocurrency traders to evade capital gains taxes on digital asset profits.
−Undermines tax fairness by treating cryptocurrency gains differently from stocks, bonds, and other traditional investments.
−Reduces IRS ability to track illicit activities like money laundering and terrorist financing that may use cryptocurrencies.
−Could disproportionately benefit wealthy cryptocurrency investors who are more likely to engage in large-scale trading.
−Contradicts Democratic priorities of ensuring everyone pays their fair share of taxes and closing tax avoidance loopholes.

Republicans

MIGHT SUPPORT
+Protects user privacy by preventing the IRS from collecting detailed transaction data on cryptocurrency users.
+Reduces regulatory burden on emerging fintech companies and cryptocurrency businesses, fostering innovation.
+Prevents potential overreach by federal agencies in applying outdated financial regulations to new technologies.
+Addresses concerns that the rule could inadvertently capture non-broker entities like software developers or miners in its reporting requirements.
+Aligns with Republican principles of limited government intervention in private financial transactions.
MIGHT OPPOSE
−Would create a significant tax loophole, allowing cryptocurrency traders to evade capital gains taxes on digital asset profits.
−Undermines tax fairness by treating cryptocurrency gains differently from stocks, bonds, and other traditional investments.
−Reduces IRS ability to track illicit activities like money laundering and terrorist financing that may use cryptocurrencies.
−Could disproportionately benefit wealthy cryptocurrency investors who are more likely to engage in large-scale trading.
−Contradicts Republican rhetoric about fiscal responsibility by potentially reducing tax revenues needed to fund government operations.

History

Mar 12, 2025
Message received in Senate: Returned to the Senate pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 212.
Mar 11, 2025
Papers returned to Senate pursuant to H. Res. 212
Mar 10, 2025
Mar 10, 2025
Received in the House
Mar 06, 2025
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Mar 04, 2025
Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 70 - 27. Record Vote Number: 102. (text: CR S1488)
Mar 04, 2025
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 70 - 27. Record Vote Number: 102.
Mar 04, 2025
Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S1471, S1477, S1485-1488)
Mar 04, 2025
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 70 - 28. Record Vote Number: 101. (CR S1470-1471)
Feb 12, 2025
Senate Committee on Finance discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
Feb 12, 2025
Senate Committee on Finance discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
Jan 21, 2025