The Love Lives On Act of 2025 (S. 410) is a bipartisan bill aimed at improving benefits and services for surviving spouses of military veterans and service members. The legislation amends titles 10 and 38 of the United States Code to address three key areas: First, it modifies eligibility for Veterans Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) for surviving spouses who remarry. Currently, remarriage generally terminates DIC benefits, but this bill would allow surviving spouses to retain DIC benefits even after remarriage, removing a significant financial disincentive to remarrying. Second, it ensures continued eligibility for the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for certain surviving spouses who remarry, particularly those whose spouses died on active duty. The bill prevents termination of SBP annuities solely due to remarriage and provides for resumption of payments for those who had their benefits terminated due to remarriage before age 55 and before the bill's enactment. Third, it expands the definition of 'dependent' under the TRICARE health care program to include a remarried widow or widower whose subsequent marriage has ended due to death, divorce, or annulment, thereby restoring TRICARE eligibility for such individuals. The bill was introduced by a bipartisan group of senators including Jerry Moran (R-KS), Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Mike Rounds (R-SD), John Fetterman (D-PA), John Cornyn (R-TX), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Ted Cruz (R-TX), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Angus King (I-ME), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Chris Coons (D-DE), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN). The bill seeks to recognize the enduring nature of the marital bond and provide continued support to surviving spouses who choose to remarry, acknowledging that remarriage does not diminish their service-related sacrifices or needs.
Ask This Bill
Ask a specific question about this bill’s actual text — answers cite the section they come from.
+Advances gender equity by addressing disproportionate impact on women, who constitute the majority of military surviving spouses.
+Promotes social justice by eliminating discriminatory policies that penalize surviving spouses for remarriage.
+Expands access to critical healthcare through TRICARE for vulnerable populations who may have lost coverage due to remarriage and subsequent divorce/widowhood.
+Provides economic security to surviving spouses, reducing poverty risks among military families.
+Recognizes the reality of modern relationships and supports individual autonomy in personal life decisions.
+Addresses historical inequities in military benefits systems that have disadvantaged remarried surviving spouses.
+Strengthens military community resilience by supporting families through all life transitions.
+Aligns with Democratic values of strengthening social safety nets and supporting vulnerable populations.
MIGHT OPPOSE
−Does not go far enough to address all inequities in military survivor benefits, such as benefits for surviving partners in non-married relationships.
−May create administrative burdens for veterans' service organizations and surviving spouses navigating the benefit restoration process.
−Potential stigma or procedural barriers that prevent eligible surviving spouses from accessing restored benefits.
−Does not address concurrent receipt issues that may affect some surviving spouses receiving other federal benefits.
−May not provide adequate outreach to unaware surviving spouses who could benefit from the provisions.
−Concern that funding mechanisms are not specified, potentially leading to budget offsets elsewhere.
−Could create confusion about eligibility criteria among beneficiaries and service providers.
−May not sufficiently address the needs of surviving spouses who remarried at younger ages or face unique circumstance.
Republicans
MIGHT SUPPORT
+Supports military families and veterans by providing continued financial security to surviving spouses who remarry, recognizing their ongoing needs.
+Removes financial penalties that discourage remarriage among surviving military spouses, promoting personal happiness and family stability.
+Reduces long-term government costs by allowing surviving spouses to maintain benefits through remarriage rather than remaining single to preserve benefits.
+Aligns with conservative values of supporting traditional marriage while acknowledging changing life circumstances.
+Provides targeted assistance to surviving spouses of active-duty service members, addressing a specific vulnerable population.
+Increases efficiency by simplifying eligibility rules and reducing administrative burdens related to benefit termination and reinstatement.
+Supports military retention and recruitment by demonstrating that the government cares for families of fallen service members long-term.
MIGHT OPPOSE
−Concern about increased federal spending and long-term budgetary impacts from expanding entitlement benefits.
−Potential for creating unfair advantages compared to other survivor benefit systems that terminate upon remarriage.
−Risk of fraud or abuse if eligibility verification is not sufficiently rigorous for remarried spouses seeking benefit restoration.
−Concern that the bill creates a new entitlement that may be difficult to repeal or modify in the future.
−Preference for market-based solutions or private sector support rather than government benefit expansions.
−Concern about preferential treatment for military surviving spouses compared to other federal survivor benefits.
−Potential administrative complexity in implementing the remarriage exceptions and benefit restoration provisions.
![Sen. Moran, Jerry [R-KS]](https://www.congress.gov/img/member/m000934_200.jpg)