Home  /  Recent Bills  /  National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2027
HOUSE · HR 8595 119 CONGRESS

National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2027

Making appropriations for national security, Department of State, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2027, and for other purposes.

INTRODUCED
April 30, 2026
POLICY AREA
STATUS
Received in the Senate.
SOURCE
Congress.gov ↗

Bill Summary

This bill, H.R. 8595, is the National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2027. It appropriates funds for the Department of State, foreign assistance programs, international security assistance, multilateral assistance, export and investment assistance, and related agencies for fiscal year 2027. The bill is divided into eight titles and two divisions. Division A focuses on appropriations for national security, the Department of State, and related programs. Title I provides funding for the Department of State and related programs, including diplomatic programs, consular and border security, capital investment, educational and cultural exchanges, representation expenses, protection of foreign missions, embassy security, emergencies, repatriation loans, payment to the American Institute in Taiwan, international communications activities, payment to the Foreign Service Retirement Fund, contributions to international organizations, peacekeeping activities, international commissions, and related programs such as The Asia Foundation, Center for Middle Eastern-Western Dialogue Trust Fund, Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships, Israeli Arab Scholarship Program, East-West Center, and National Endowment for Democracy. Title II covers oversight of diplomatic engagement and foreign assistance, funding the Offices of Inspector General for the Department of State and foreign assistance programs. Title III provides bilateral economic assistance, including global health programs ($3.35 billion), HIV/AIDS assistance ($5.53 billion), international humanitarian assistance ($5 billion), United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund ($100 million), national security investment programs ($6.89 billion), democracy fund ($205.2 million), Peace Corps ($410.5 million), Millennium Challenge Corporation ($830 million), United States Foundation for Natural Security and Counterterrorism ($100 million), and international affairs technical assistance ($30 million). Title IV covers international security assistance, including international narcotics control and law enforcement ($1.66 billion), nonproliferation, anti-terrorism, demining and related programs ($870 million), security sector programs ($235 million), international military education and training ($119 million), and foreign military financing program ($6.75 billion). Title V covers multilateral assistance, including contributions to the Global Environment Facility ($139.6 million), International Development Association ($504 million), Asian Development Fund ($43.6 million), African Development Bank ($32.4 million), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ($67.5 million), Inter-American Investment Corporation ($30 million), and International Fund for Agricultural Development ($30 million). Title VI covers export and investment assistance, funding the Export-Import Bank and the United States International Development Finance Corporation. Title VII contains general provisions, including allowances and differentials, unobligated balances report, consulting services, diplomatic facilities, personnel actions, prohibition on publicity or propaganda, prohibition against direct funding for certain countries, coups d'etat, transfer of funds authority, prohibition and limitation on certain expenses, assistance effectiveness and transparency, limitation on assistance to countries in default, prohibition on taxation of United States assistance, availability and designated funding levels, notification requirements, documents and records management, use of funds in contravention of this act, prohibition on funding for abortions and involuntary sterilization, allocations and reports, multi-year pledges, prohibition on assistance to governments supporting international terrorism, stabilization and development, definition of program, project, and activity, prohibition on censorship, commerce, trade and surplus commodities, separate accounts, eligibility for assistance, promotion of United States economic interests, international financial institutions, economic resilience initiative, financial management and anti-corruption, democracy programs, international religious freedom, special provisions (forensic assistance, genocide victims memorial sites, exchange visitor program, partner vetting, international child abductions, transfer of funds for extraordinary protection, impact on jobs, extension of authorities, HIV/AIDS working capital fund), law enforcement and security, countering the flow of fentanyl and other synthetic drugs, Palestinian statehood, prohibition on assistance to the Palestinian Broadcasting Corporation, oversight requirements for the West Bank and Gaza, limitation on assistance for the Palestinian Authority, Middle East and North Africa (Egypt, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, West Bank and Gaza), Africa (African Great Lakes Region, Nigeria, South Africa, South Sudan, Sudan), East Asia and the Pacific (Burma, Indo-Pacific Strategy, Mission Australia, North Korea, Pacific Islands Countries, People's Republic of China, Hong Kong, Philippines, Vietnam Education Foundation, Taiwan, Tibet), South and Central Asia (Taliban), Latin America and the Caribbean (assistance prioritization, Central America, Colombia, Cuba, Cuban Doctors, facilitating irresponsible migration, Haiti, Mexico, Nicaragua, Organization of American States, the Caribbean, Venezuela), Europe and Eurasia (Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act, territorial integrity, Turkey, requirements), countering Russian influence and aggression, United Nations and other international organizations, United Nations Relief and Works Agency and justice for victims, internet freedom, torture prohibition, aircraft transfer and coordination, parking fines and real property taxes, international monetary fund, extradition, enterprise funds, limitations related to global health assistance, global health activities, women's equality and empowerment, sector allocations (basic and higher education, conservation programs, development programs, food security and agricultural development, programs to combat trafficking in persons, water and sanitation), environment limitations, budget documents, reorganization, Department of State matters, foreign assistance management, America First Opportunity Fund, additional limitations on operations and assistance, rescissions, and limitation on the use of funds for certain online speech-related activities. Division B is the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (SAVE America Act), which amends the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require documentary proof of United States citizenship for voter registration and to require photo identification as a condition of casting a ballot in federal elections.

Ask This Bill

Ask a specific question about this bill’s actual text — answers cite the section they come from.

Read the full analysis on Congress.gov →

Where Each Party Stands

Democrats

MIGHT SUPPORT
+Provides robust funding for global health initiatives, including $3.35 billion for global health programs and $5.53 billion for HIV/AIDS assistance, which aligns with Democratic priorities in combating infectious diseases and supporting health equity worldwide.
+Allocates $5 billion for international humanitarian assistance, emphasizing disaster relief, refugee support, and migration assistance, reflecting Democratic commitment to humanitarian aid and compassionate foreign policy.
+Invests in democracy and human rights programs through the democracy fund, National Endowment for Depression, and international religious freedom office, supporting civil society and good governance abroad.
+Strengthens alliances and partnerships in critical regions, including substantial aid to Israel ($3.3 billion), Egypt, Jordan, and Indo-Pacific partners, promoting stability and cooperation.
+Addresses climate change and environmental concerns indirectly through funding for biodiversity conservation, wildlife poaching prevention, and food security programs, though subject to environmental limitations in the bill.
+Supports international cooperation and multilateral engagement through contributions to international organizations and peacekeeping activities, with accountability measures to ensure effective use of funds.
+Promotes gender equality and women's empowerment through dedicated funding for women's economic entrepreneurship, leadership programs, violence prevention, and women, peace, and security initiatives.
+Includes protections against discrimination and executive overreach, such as prohibitions on using funds for first-class travel, censorship, and discriminatory practices in foreign assistance programs.
+Supports immigrant and refugee communities through specific provisions, including assistance for refugees resettling in Israel and oversight mechanisms for West Bank and Gaza assistance to prevent diversion to extremist groups.
+Enhances transparency and accountability in foreign assistance spending through rigorous reporting, consultation, and notification requirements, and impact evaluations.
MIGHT OPPOSE
−The bill includes restrictive provisions that limit funding for certain global health activities, such as capping family planning/reproductive health funding at $461 million and prohibiting support for the United Nations Population Fund, which contradicts Democratic support for comprehensive reproductive health access.
−Imposes limitations on assistance to countries deemed to support international terrorism or violate human rights, which may hinder humanitarian aid in complex crises where engagement with controversial governments is necessary.
−Contains environmental limitations that prohibit funding for certain climate change initiatives, such as the Green Climate Fund and Paris Agreement implementation, conflicting with Democratic priorities on climate action.
−Restricts certain types of speech-related activities online through Section 7069, which could be seen as infringing on free expression and digital rights, a concern for Democrats who prioritize internet freedom and open discourse.
−The voter ID requirements in Division B (SAVE America Act) may disproportionately disenfranchise minority, elderly, low-income, and student voters who face barriers in obtaining documentary proof of citizenship or photo ID, conflicting with Democratic efforts to expand ballot access.
−While the bill funds international humanitarian assistance, it includes strict oversight and vetting requirements that could delay or complicate aid delivery in emergency situations.
−The bill's emphasis on countering fentanyl and migration, while important, may come at the expense of broader development and diplomatic engagement in some regions.
−The prohibition on funding for abortions and involuntary sterilization in foreign assistance, while longstanding, is opposed by Democrats who support reproductive rights globally.
−The bill's focus on security and law enforcement assistance may militarize foreign policy at the expense of diplomacy and development aid, a concern for those who advocate for a balanced approach.
−Certain provisions, such as those regarding the Palestinian Authority and West Bank and Gaza, include complex conditionalities that could impede humanitarian and development assistance to Palestinians in need.

Republicans

MIGHT SUPPORT
+Supports strong national defense and foreign policy by allocating substantial funds for embassy security, worldwide security protection, and foreign military financing, enhancing U.S. global influence and readiness.
+Promotes democratic values and human rights internationally through funding for democracy programs, the National Endowment for Democracy, and international religious freedom initiatives, aligning with traditional Republican support for freedom abroad.
+Includes strict accountability measures, such as notification requirements, spending reports, and prohibitions on funding for certain activities (e.g., abortions, first-class travel, censorship), ensuring fiscal responsibility and alignment with conservative values.
+Addresses immigration and border security concerns by tying foreign assistance to migration control, including provisions to counter fentanyl trafficking and irregular migration, and by requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration in Division B.
+Strengthens alliances and partnerships, particularly with Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and Indo-Pacific partners, through significant military and economic aid, reinforcing U.S. leadership in key regions.
+Supports countering adversarial influences from China, Russia, Iran, and terrorism through dedicated funds like the Countering PRC Influence Fund and Countering Russian Influence Fund, and restrictions on assistance to hostile nations.
+Promotes economic statecraft by prioritizing diplomatic engagement to foster commercial relations and protect U.S. business interests abroad, reflecting Republican emphasis on economic diplomacy.
+Includes protections for U.S. taxpayers by ensuring that funds are not used to support international organizations that engage in harmful practices or that tax U.S. assistance, and by requiring reimbursement of foreign taxes.
+Supports veterans and retired foreign service personnel through payments to the Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund.
+Encourages public-private partnerships and innovation through provisions allowing funds to be used for administrative expenses, technology transfers, and engagement with nongovernmental organizations in appropriate contexts.
MIGHT OPPOSE
−The bill allocates significant funds to international organizations and multilateral institutions, which some Republicans view as inefficient or contrary to America First principles, potentially undermining sovereignty and increasing dependence on foreign entities.
−While the bill includes strong security funding, some Republicans may argue that the level of foreign assistance, particularly in global health and humanitarian aid, exceeds what is necessary for U.S. national interest and contributes to fiscal irresponsibility.
−The bill's numerous notification, consultation, and reporting requirements may create bureaucratic inefficiencies and slow the deployment of funds, frustrating those who prefer streamlined executive action.
−Provisions related to the Palestinian Authority and West Bank and Gaza, while intended to ensure accountability, may be seen by some Republicans as overly restrictive or insufficiently supportive of Israel's security needs.
−The bill's emphasis on democracy promotion and human rights abroad could be viewed by some Republicans as idealistic or prone to mission creep, potentially funding ineffective or counterproductive programs.
−The inclusion of the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (Division B) may be seen by some Republicans as unnecessary or redundant, given existing state voter ID laws, or as an overreach into state election administration.
−While the bill counters China and Russia influence, some Republicans may believe the funding levels or strategies are insufficient to adequately address these threats.
−The bill's restrictions on certain online speech-related activities (Section 7069) could be interpreted by free-market Republicans as government overreach into digital spaces, even if intended to combat harmful content.
−The bill's funding for international financial institutions may be criticized by Republicans who prefer private sector solutions and view such contributions as distorting markets or creating moral hazard.
−The bill's complex earmarks and conditionalities may lead to inefficient allocation of funds and reduce flexibility for the Executive Branch to respond to emerging crises.

History

Jul 29, 2026
Received in the Senate.
Jul 15, 2026
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 217 - 209 (Roll no. 247).
Jul 15, 2026
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 217 - 209 (Roll no. 247).
Jul 15, 2026
On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 216 (Roll no. 246).
Jul 15, 2026
The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
Jul 15, 2026
Mr. Amo moved to recommit to the Committee on Appropriations.
Jul 15, 2026
The House adopted the amendments en gros as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Jul 15, 2026
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Jul 15, 2026
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 8595.
Jul 15, 2026
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Jul 15, 2026
Considered as unfinished business.
Jul 15, 2026
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 8595 as unfinished business.
Jul 15, 2026
On motion that the committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Jul 15, 2026
Mr. Diaz-Balart moved that the committee rise.
Jul 15, 2026
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1423, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Tenney amendment No. 28.
Jul 15, 2026
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1423, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Steube amendment No. 27.
Jul 15, 2026
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Roy amendment No. 20, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Lois Frankel (FL) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Jul 15, 2026
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1423, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Roy amendment No. 20.
Jul 15, 2026
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Massie amendment No. 9, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Massie demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
SPONSOR
RELATED BILLS