A joint resolution goes through the same process as a bill and carries the same legal force once signed. One exception: a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment is not presented to the President — it needs a two-thirds vote in both chambers and then ratification by three-quarters of the states. Bill vs. resolution, explained →
This joint resolution, H.J. Res. 1 of the 119th Congress, proposes a constitutional amendment to fix the size of the Supreme Court of the United States at nine justices – one chief justice and eight associate justices. Currently, the Constitution does not specify the number of justices; it is set by congressional statute, which has been nine since 1869, though it has varied in the past. The resolution follows theArticle V process for constitutional amendments: it must be passed by two-thirds of both the House and Senate, then submitted to the states for ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures (or conventions) within seven years. If ratified, it would become part of the Constitution, preventing any future change to the Court's size by simple legislation. Proponents argue it would depoliticize the Court and prevent 'court-packing' schemes, while opponents contend it unnecessarily constitutionalizes a matter best left to legislative discretion and could hinder efforts to reform the Court in response to perceived ideological imbalances or workload pressures.
Ask a specific question about this bill’s actual text — answers cite the section they come from.