Bill Summary
What the bill does: H.R. 1882, the “Saving Gig Economy Taxpayers Act,” would roll back the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) change to Form 1099-K reporting by third-party settlement organizations (TPSOs) such as PayPal, Venmo, Cash App, Etsy, eBay, Airbnb, and similar platforms. Specifically, it restores the pre-2021 “de minimis” thresholds under Internal Revenue Code section 6050W for third-party network transactions so that a platform only has to issue a 1099-K to a payee if, in a calendar year, the payee both (1) receives more than $20,000 in gross payments and (2) has more than 200 transactions. ARPA had lowered the federal threshold to a single trigger of $600 with no transaction minimum, which led to significant concern among casual sellers and small-scale gig workers.
Key provisions:
- Section 2 amends IRC 6050W(e) to reinstate the de minimis exception as it existed prior to ARPA: the $20,000 and 200-transaction dual threshold for TPSO reporting of third-party network transactions. Payment card transactions (handled by merchant acquirers) are unaffected; those have never had the same de minimis rule and remain reportable under existing law.
Pros
- Reduces confusion and unintended burden on casual sellers who receive 1099-Ks even when selling personal items at a loss, which are often not taxable.
- Mitigates the risk that low-income gig workers face unexpected backup withholding due to TIN mismatches on small or irregular earnings.
- Aligns federal policy with the IRS’s transitional delays, creating clearer expectations for taxpayers and platforms during filing seasons.
- Lowers administrative and customer-service strain on the IRS and platforms, potentially freeing resources for higher-impact compliance efforts.
- Could help avoid erroneous matching notices and lower audit risks for low-dollar taxpayers who misinterpret 1099-Ks.
- Restores a clear, high de minimis threshold that protects casual sellers and small-scale gig workers from unnecessary paperwork and government overreach.
- Reduces compliance costs and customer-service burdens on platforms and small businesses, supporting entrepreneurship and the gig economy.
- Prevents surprise 1099-Ks and backup withholding on low-volume users, helping cash flow and reducing accidental noncompliance.
- Provides policy stability after several IRS transition delays and changing guidance, lowering uncertainty for taxpayers and TPSOs.
- Targets enforcement away from small-dollar activity and toward higher-value issues, consistent with a limited-government approach.
Cons
- Likely reduces third-party reporting and weakens tax compliance in the platform economy, widening the tax gap compared to ARPA’s $600 standard.
- Creates potential revenue loss that could otherwise fund public investments and social programs favored by Democrats.
- Reinstating high thresholds may benefit not only casual sellers but also higher-earning sellers who can structure activity to avoid crossing the dual thresholds (e.g., using multiple platforms/accounts).
- Fragmentation risk: states with their own lower thresholds may maintain them, creating confusion and inequity across jurisdictions.
- The retroactive effective-date language could complicate administration and reduce the effectiveness of ARPA’s original compliance objective.
- Some Republicans may worry that any 1099-K regime still imposes compliance burdens on small businesses that exceed the thresholds; they might prefer broader deregulation or higher thresholds still.
- Could invite criticism that the party is soft on tax enforcement if revenue losses or underreporting become salient, especially amid deficit concerns.
- The dual-threshold design may encourage threshold gaming across platforms, creating inefficiencies and uneven competitive effects among marketplaces.
This bill was introduced on March 05, 2025 in the House.
View on Congress.gov:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1882
-
Mar 05, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
H11100
-
Mar 05, 2025
Introduced in House
Intro-H
-
Mar 05, 2025
Introduced in House
1000
This bill has not yet been enacted into law.
Sponsors
Policy Area: Taxation