Senate 21 REMOTE Act

REMOTE Act

Bill Summary

The REMOTE Act (S. 21) is a federal workforce oversight bill focused on how Executive departments manage and measure telework. It does not ban or mandate telework; instead, it standardizes data collection, retention, and reporting so Congress and agency leaders can assess telework utilization and compare remote activity to in-office activity.

Key definitions set the scope. “Executive department” tracks the 5 U.S.C. §101 list (e.g., State, Defense, Justice). An “agency office” is any department-owned or -leased office space regularly used by at least one department employee or contractor. A “computer network” is the department-operated system employees must connect to for work (email, user accounts, file systems). “Login” is the act of making that digital connection. “Network traffic” means volume and flow of data across the network (i.e., metadata, not necessarily content). “Teleworking employee” includes both federal staff and contractors working under department contracts who are covered by a telework agreement and not detailed to another entity. “Working remotely” means using a computer to perform duties from outside agency offices (or, for contractors, outside their company’s space).

Section 2 requires each department to put uniform policies in place within 180 days to record two kinds of information for teleworking employees: login activity and network traffic generated, and to require managers to periodically review the network traffic of teleworkers while they are working remotely. Within one year of enactment, departments must begin retaining specific data for each teleworking employee who works remotely: the average number of logins per day, the average daily duration of network connection, and the network traffic generated during remote work. Departments must keep this information for at least three years before it can be disposed of.

Pros

  • Creates a standardized, transparent process for revoking telework privileges, requiring written justification and notice to the employee, which promotes fairness, due process, and accountability in management decisions.
  • Protects personally identifiable information in public-facing reports while still providing aggregate utilization metrics, balancing transparency with privacy concerns.
  • Uses data to inform policy rather than imposing a blanket return-to-office mandate, allowing agencies to tailor telework to mission needs and employee circumstances.
  • Standardized metrics across departments could reveal inequities or arbitrary practices, helping unions and oversight bodies identify problematic revocations or patterns of discrimination.
  • Comparative reporting (remote vs. headquarters login rates) can highlight where telework is working well, supporting evidence-based continuation of flexible work where productivity is high.
  • Applies to contractors as well as employees, reducing loopholes and ensuring consistent expectations across a blended workforce.
  • Could support long-term space optimization and hybrid models, potentially freeing resources for mission priorities and improving employee retention and recruitment, including for people with disabilities and caregivers.
  • Creates clear, agency-wide accountability for telework utilization, addressing concerns about underutilization or abuse of remote work on the taxpayers’ dime.
  • Provides standardized, comparable data in budget justifications, giving Congress concrete benchmarks to oversee workforce practices and tie them to funding decisions.
  • Mandates retention of data for at least three years, enabling audits, Inspector General reviews, and GAO assessments to investigate telework performance issues over time.
  • Requires managers to periodically review teleworker network activity, reinforcing expectations of active supervision and performance management in remote settings.
  • Includes contractors and headquarters-based employees, closing gaps and allowing apples-to-apples comparisons across the workforce.
  • CAC/PIV login requirements improve identity assurance and attribution for network activity, strengthening cybersecurity and integrity of the data.
  • Comparing remote and in-office login rates by weekday can expose mismatches between approvals and actual work, supporting right-sizing of telework and office space.
  • Protects PII in public reporting while still surfacing utilization patterns, encouraging transparency without doxxing individuals.

Cons

  • Emphasizes surveillance-like metrics (logins, connection duration, network traffic), which are imperfect proxies for productivity and may chill flexibility, creativity, and morale.
  • Three-year retention of detailed network telemetry increases privacy and cybersecurity risks, especially if data are breached or used beyond original purposes.
  • Managerial “periodic review” of teleworkers’ network traffic is ambiguous and could encroach on privacy; even if content is not mandated, metadata can reveal sensitive patterns.
  • The CHCO annual report’s focus on adverse effects of telework risks biasing policy debates toward negatives without requiring balanced reporting on benefits and performance gains.
  • Administrative and IT compliance costs may divert resources from core missions and could disproportionately burden smaller departments or subcomponents.
  • May complicate collective bargaining and established telework agreements, creating friction with unions if policies are imposed unilaterally or weaponized to restrict telework.
  • CAC/PIV login and detailed activity tracking for headquarters staff may be duplicative and add red tape without clear value for assessing in-person productivity.
  • Contractor inclusion raises questions about employer data rights and privacy, potentially straining relationships with vendors and their employees.
  • Imposes new compliance costs, IT buildouts, and reporting burdens that may expand bureaucracy rather than streamline it, with uncertain ROI.
  • May inadvertently legitimize and entrench telework by formalizing processes and erecting procedural hurdles to revocation, making it harder to swiftly curb remote work when needed.
  • Activity metrics (logins, duration, traffic) can be gamed and do not guarantee productivity, potentially encouraging performative behavior instead of outcomes-based management.
  • Storing large volumes of telemetry for three years creates a high-value target for cyber adversaries and insider threats, adding security risk and cost.
  • Overly prescriptive micromanagement of the Executive Branch could conflict with agency discretion and mission-specific needs; some conservatives may prefer outcome audits over activity surveillance.
  • Managers may become reluctant to revoke telework privileges due to documentation requirements, leading to fewer corrective actions and weaker discipline.
  • Mandating inclusion in budget materials adds clutter and could politicize workforce management, encouraging scorekeeping over substantive performance improvements.

This bill was introduced on January 07, 2025 in the Senate.

View on Congress.gov:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/21

  • Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

  • Introduced in Senate

    10000

This bill has not yet been enacted into law.

No related bills found for this legislation.

BILL IMAGE

Sponsors

Policy Area: Government Operations and Politics

Associated Legislative Subjects

  • Commuting
  • Computers and information technology
  • Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management
  • Government information and archives
  • Public contracts and procurement